The JFK Cut-N-Paste Assassination
Lateral X-Rays
Something possessed me to play around with the lateral pre-and post- mortem X-rays. I took the pre-mortem X-ray from http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/images/5/55/Photo_hsca_ex_297.jpg
and I took the post-mortem X-ray from
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6GwGOKCkHhw/UI2ctUubwiI/AAAAAAAAKM4/sijStlm_aL4/s1600/JFK-Xray-Lateral.jpg
I used these images only because they were fairly high quality, compared with other online images of the X-Rays. Much to my surprise, I didn't have to do any resizing to get them to fit one over the other. I overlaid the post-mortem image over the pre-mortem image, reduced the opaqueness to 0% (completely transparent), then increased the opaqueness by 10% a step at a time, and turned the resulting images into a QuickTime movie.
I'm amazed at a few things that resulted, at the borders that seem to be maintained across both X-rays. It seems to me that there might be a slight difference in perspective of the two X-rays, or that the autopsy X-ray, supposedly showing fractures and what-not, might have been taken from a slightly different angle. Could it be coincidence that the perspective/angle are exactly the same, or that this is what should be expected of pre- and post-mortem X-rays of a gunshot victim? Or is this further evidence of fraud in the medical evidence of the assassination? Here is a YouTube link to my work:
Lateral X-Rays
Something possessed me to play around with the lateral pre-and post- mortem X-rays. I took the pre-mortem X-ray from http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/images/5/55/Photo_hsca_ex_297.jpg
and I took the post-mortem X-ray from
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6GwGOKCkHhw/UI2ctUubwiI/AAAAAAAAKM4/sijStlm_aL4/s1600/JFK-Xray-Lateral.jpg
I used these images only because they were fairly high quality, compared with other online images of the X-Rays. Much to my surprise, I didn't have to do any resizing to get them to fit one over the other. I overlaid the post-mortem image over the pre-mortem image, reduced the opaqueness to 0% (completely transparent), then increased the opaqueness by 10% a step at a time, and turned the resulting images into a QuickTime movie.
I'm amazed at a few things that resulted, at the borders that seem to be maintained across both X-rays. It seems to me that there might be a slight difference in perspective of the two X-rays, or that the autopsy X-ray, supposedly showing fractures and what-not, might have been taken from a slightly different angle. Could it be coincidence that the perspective/angle are exactly the same, or that this is what should be expected of pre- and post-mortem X-rays of a gunshot victim? Or is this further evidence of fraud in the medical evidence of the assassination? Here is a YouTube link to my work:
Here are 3 still images from that video for an alternate format of comparison:
So...coincidence? Or more evidence of forgery? We already know that the "White Patch (visible in the lateral autopsy image) is a forgery, thanks to Dr. Mantik. We know that the "6.5 mm object" and the "T-Inscription" in other X-rays are also forgeries (again, due to Dr. Mantik's work). We know that the "burn mark" is a forgery (thanks to Dr. Chesser). So how were these forgeries created? I suspect that the lateral "autopsy X-Ray" was created using the "living" X-Ray, so it could be "authenticated" as belonging to JFK. The real X-rays probably show more massive fracturing and a different pattern for the fractures than this "autopsy X-Ray" shows.